FreeThought Fort Wayne

        Be Reasonable

Posts Tagged ‘myth’

Posted by Skeptigator on December 10, 2008

I wanted to drop a quick note regarding a fairly new blog (started October 2008) dedicated to and run by Rational Moms. It’s called, a very appropriately named if a bit unimaginative name. I tease, of course.

As their About page states,

Thinking rationally and critically is not easy when there is so much information—and misinformation—all around us.  Not only is it tough to question certain issues without a medical degree, it’s tough to even know what to question.

Our goal is to help sort through all the information out there and point people, including ourselves, in the right direction so that we can spend less time worrying and more time with our families.

And in case you needed more of an incentive to add their feed to your favorite feed reader, here’s a sampling of topics, with little tidbits to make you want more.

The Myth of the “Sugar High”

A couple of my friends [informed] me that there is no such thing as a “sugar high”.

This seemed crazy to me, I thought it was common knowledge that eating a lot of sugar gives you a buzzed feeling and makes you hyper. Kids go crazy and run around like Tasmanian devils at birthday parties and holidays because of all the sugar, right? Wrong.

You do not walk up to a complete stranger and criticize their parenting

The entire exchange lasted only a few moments, but I distinctly remember that I led Jillie away from the Crazy as quickly as possible. I wanted to smack that lady across the mouth.

The funny thing is that I do, to a certain degree, believe in evolution. I also believe in God. and I also believe that YOU DO NOT WALK UP TO A COMPLETE STRANGER AND CRITICIZE THEIR PARENTING.

In defense of formula

I understand that breast feeding is natural, but we shouldn’t forget that high infant mortality rates are probably also natural. I’m sure formula has saved many babies from malnutrition. I am glad breast feeding has become accepted in my generation, because it’s enjoyable, good for my son, and well, cheap. I don’t think I’d want to pony up for formula every week. But formula feeding sisters, I’ve got your back. You’ll never get the stink eye from me.

Add to FacebookAdd to NewsvineAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to Furl


Posted in FreeThought, Skepticism | Tagged: , , , , , , , | 1 Comment »

You only think you need more sleep

Posted by neuralgourmet on October 16, 2008

Do you need more sleep? You might think you do, but sleep researcher Jim Horne says otherwise

Do you need more sleep? You might think you do, but sleep researcher Jim Horne says otherwise

I just had a nightcap and I was about to turn in for a good night’s sleep when I spied this fascinating article on sleep over at New Scientist. Everybody could use more sleep right? We’re all chronically sleep deprived. I know I believed that. And it seems a constant refrain in the media. Heck, my pulmonologist even told me that the night before my sleep study to determine sleep apnea.

But sleep researcher Jim Horne says it is indeed a myth.

ASK people whether they would like more sleep, and most will say yes. Does that mean they are not sleeping enough? The apparent desire for more shut-eye, together with oft-repeated assertions that our grandparents slept longer, all too easily leads to the conclusion that we in the west are chronically sleep-deprived. Adding to these concerns are recent claims that inadequate sleep causes obesity and related disorders, such as diabetes.

Plus ça change. Claims of widespread sleep deprivation in western society are nothing new – in 1894, the British Medical Journal ran an editorial warning that the “hurry and excitement” of modern life was leading to an epidemic of insomnia.

Even then it probably wasn’t true. The fact is that most adults get enough sleep, and our collective sleep debt, if it exists at all, has not worsened in recent times. Moreover, claims that sleep deprivation is contributing to obesity and diabetes have been overblown. My assertion is that the vast majority of people sleep perfectly adequately. That’s not to say that sleep deprivation doesn’t exist. But in general we’ve never had it so good.

While it’s hard for me to disagree with Horne’s studies, I’m not sure I agree with all of his conclusions though. For instance:

To gauge the respondents’ determination to make up their perceived sleep debt, we then asked, “If you had an extra hour a day, how would you prefer to spend it?” The alternatives were playing sport or exercising, socialising, reading or relaxing, watching TV or listening to the radio, working, sleeping, and “other”.

Only a handful of people opted to use their extra hour for sleep. It seems that wanting more sleep is not necessarily synonymous with needing more sleep, and that given a choice, people will happily forego extra sleep in favour of other leisure activities.

Before my sleep apnea was diagnosed and treated if I was asked what I’d do with an extra hour a day I’d definitely have said something like reading, or socializing. Yet I was most most certainly sleep deprived in a massive sort of way.

We’re conditioned in American culture at least, I think, to think that if we have extra time we should be doing something productive. Horne makes that suggestion too. So it seems only natural for someone to not admit to a need for more sleep. Still, this is an fascinating article that deftly dismisses several pop-cultural tropes about sleep and Horne gives us much to consider. I’ll be adding his book Sleepfaring: A Journey Through The Science Of Sleep to my long, long list of books to read. You know, that list I keep for the day I suddenly find myself not needing sleep.

Posted in Science | Tagged: , , , | 2 Comments »